Site icon Ali Raza

Google Ads What Went Wrong : Here’s the Fix: CTR, QS, SKAGs, & Negatives

google ads what went wrong
Rate this post

If your broad campaign (A) is converting but your precise/product-name campaign (B) barely serves and pays huge CPCs, the culprit is usually low CTR, which crushes Quality Score and inflates CPC. Fix it by tightening structure, ad copy, and landing page relevance, plus negative keywords to clean intent.

The scenario

Why this happens (in practice)

  1. Low CTR → Lower Quality Score → Higher CPC. Google rewards high expected CTR with cheaper clicks and better auction priority.
  2. Relevance leak points:
    • Over-stuffed ad groups (too many keywords per ad)
    • Generic ad copy that doesn’t mirror the query
    • One generic landing page for all queries (mismatch of promise vs page)

Fix it (step-by-step)

1) Restructure into SKAGs or tight themed ad groups

2) Rewrite ads to mirror the query

Template snippet (RSA):

3) Align landing pages to intent

4) Audit match types & add negatives

5) Bidding & eligibility checks

6) Measure the right leading indicators

Quick checklist (copy & use)

FAQs

Q: Why does Keyword Planner show lower CPCs than I pay?
A: Planner is directional. In-auction CPC depends on QS, competition, extensions, and eligibility at that moment—low CTR can push you far above Planner ranges.

Q: Should I pause the broad campaign while fixing exact?
A: No. Keep the winner running; fix structure and relevance in the precise campaign, then reassess budget split.

Q: SKAGs or themes in 2026?
A: Either works if you keep tight intent and maintain ad/landing relevance. The problem is loose groupings, not the framework.

Call to action
If you want me to review your structure, ads, and search terms and send a punch-list, get in touch—happy to help.

Exit mobile version